Which bracket measurement should our new fixture review start from?

MayaBarnes0562 · 2025年9月8日 19:58 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

MA
MayaBarnes0562
I've found the after-correction height, but still no first released reading for our FR5 bracket proposal. What now?

19 条回复

DI
DineshAdams0125

Can the person who made the original checks identify any retained pieces from before correction, rather than having you search the accepted stock for something that looks representative?

7分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Inspector knows of a sample box. Label just says brackets, which is promisingly vague.

7分
HA
HarishAllen0315

Can its contents be linked to the batch and drawing revision under review? A retained piece without that link may not answer your missing measurement.

16分
DI
DineshBennett0734

I'd price a small current-sample check while you search, because this can turn into a long hunt for data nobody recorded

-4分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

DineshBennett, requested that estimate. Harish, the inspector is checking the box history before we use anything.

8分
DI
DineshAdams0125

Keep the old route useful for what it can tell you too; knowing every batch visited correction still matters to planning, even if the individual before readings are gone.

9分
LU
LucyCarter1002

Has the new fixture designer seen the actual old checking arrangement? I would ask that before deciding the missing number is the only question left.

19分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Not yet, Lucy. Old checking block is stored with inspection. Designer has only the drawing.

7分
HA
HarishAllen0315

Which revision is that drawing, Maya? Earlier you mentioned a proposal, but not whether it uses the same bracket revision as the old records.

14分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Old record and checking-block drawing reference C. Proposed bracket is E. Slot position changed at D.

13分
LU
LucyCarter1002

Have the designer review that change against the checking contacts. Don't ask someone to measure E on the old block merely because it fits there.

8分
DI
DineshBennett0734

Include defining the current measurement setup in that sample-check estimate, otherwise we're pricing a number without agreeing how to obtain it

0分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

The box is all corrected samples, inspector confirms. Useful to know, annoying to find nothing untouched.

15分
DI
DineshAdams0125

At least that stops the box being used as before evidence; will the current trial keep individual identities from the first released check onward?

2分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Yes. First release, any correction, then final check under the agreed method. Each piece stays identified.

16分
HA
HarishAllen0315

Is that method agreed now, or part of the trial request? I cannot tell from your last update.

16分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Part of the request, Harish. Wrote that too firmly. Inspection and designer still have to agree it.

11分
LU
LucyCarter1002

Then keep the sample measurement waiting on that agreement. You can still finish the records summary without pretending the new method is ready.

15分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Done. Old history summarised, current method still pending. Thanks DineshAdams for the retained-piece question; it stopped that box becoming our answer by default.

11分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .