简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Getting consistent inspection evidence before commissioning

OliverAli0189 · 2026年8月14日 00:06 UTC

回复讨论
OL
OliverAli0189
We're planning checking cosmetic metal surfaces with a fixed camera, with Universal Robots UR5e presenting a brushed stainless trim plate to a fixed camera in a cosmetic components workshop. Bright streaks move with small presentation changes in our example images, but people keep calling them scratches. We haven't commissioned the cell. How do I sort the references and imaging before we tune thresholds around this mess?

3 条回复

FI
FionaChen1195

Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result.

10
OL
OliverAli0189

Some labels came from the pictures alone. We still have the samples, but those labels aren't tied to physical inspection results. That's irritatingly circular.

0
FI
FionaChen1195

Mark those labels uncertain and have the samples inspected properly. Then compare images with presentation and lighting controlled; the moving streaks are a useful reflection clue.

3

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。