Why should unverified UR5e cover captions decide our inspection threshold?

PriyaAdams0133 · 2026年7月4日 12:54 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

PR
PriyaAdams0133
I've removed scratch certainty from the unverified examples, without calling those covers accepted. For this UR5e cover plan I still need the physical decisions linked to controlled imaging. What comparison will distinguish a genuine defect becoming hidden from a normal bright band simply moving?

1 条回复

MI
MiaBennett0731

Use quality-judged retained covers with the actual defect regions identified, alongside accepted finish examples under the same recorded conditions. Then change presentation and lighting separately. In our comparison a bright line alone would have rejected both useful examples, so I'd want to hear whether the real scratch remains visible before admiring the cleaner photograph.

6分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。