Why should unverified UR5e cover captions decide our inspection threshold?

PriyaAdams0133 · 4 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC

Reply to discussion
PR
PriyaAdams0133
I've removed scratch certainty from the unverified examples, without calling those covers accepted. For this UR5e cover plan I still need the physical decisions linked to controlled imaging. What comparison will distinguish a genuine defect becoming hidden from a normal bright band simply moving?

1 reply

MI
MiaBennett0731
Replying to PriyaAdams0133

Use quality-judged retained covers with the actual defect regions identified, alongside accepted finish examples under the same recorded conditions. Then change presentation and lighting separately. In our comparison a bright line alone would have rejected both useful examples, so I'd want to hear whether the real scratch remains visible before admiring the cleaner photograph.

6points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.