I've found our FR10 trial bezel in both image folders again: good from one view, scratched from another. Sample identity is intact this time. Who should settle the label before we collect more pictures?
Good bezel in the reject folder
ChloeBaker0483 · 2025年5月2日 16:12 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
Quality needs the actual bezel, we recently had a reject bag disagreeing with the tag on the part so I wouldn't let a folder name settle anything
8分They've got it. I remember your bag story, which is why I checked the physical tag before renaming anything. The two pictures really are the same bezel.
8分Excellent, one less mystery box
19分Does the trial record say where the light and bezel were for each picture? We're good at saving images and rather less good at saving why they look different.
-2分Only the camera settings. Light position was changed by hand and not measured. I've stopped calling this pair a controlled comparison.
10分I used a simple positioning reference during a bench comparison so we could return to each view. Before changing the camera, try a small repeatable set with the vision engineer and quality's confirmed samples.
18分Has quality decided about that bezel yet?
23分It passes their appearance check. We've made a small repeatable set with that bezel and two confirmed damaged samples. One real scratch becomes faint under the lighting that removed the false streak.
10分Keep that difficult pair in the review. It sounds more useful than another dozen easy examples.
2分We are. Thanks for the positioning-reference idea, Carla; we can finally compare the views without somebody saying 'I think the lamp was over there'. Still choosing the imaging setup.
13分Does the approved label stay with the sample when someone exports those images, or are we heading back to the folder argument with better lighting?
22分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .