I'm not signing off this layer from a top view. Our filled boxes have load-bearing end sections, but the rotated positions bridge gaps below them. The FR10 tool drawing looks tidy because it has no open fingers. Need the real boxes and the whole tool in the same review.
The FR10 pattern supports the wrong bits of our cartons
MinaAdams0163 · 2025年8月22日 04:30 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Has packaging marked those end sections on a filled-box drawing?
19分回复 RaviBell0650
Yes, marked bottom view and section. Integrator only used the outside dimensions. Packaging is asking for actual filled samples at the review as well.
14分Good. Overlay their support marks before the next animation gets polished.
22分Compare a different pattern if needed, but don't choose it solely because the carton ends look better supported; the tool still needs room to place and leave.
1分A non-rotated option is already proposed. Lower count, better drawn support, awkward opening at the end of a row. No winning picture yet.
16分Who owns comparing those two options, including the lower pallet count?
13分回复 RaviBell0650
Integrator owns the combined layout, packaging the filled-case assessment, dispatch the handling cost. I've asked for their comments against one revision before the price is updated. We haven't agreed a pattern.
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .