The FR10 pattern supports the wrong bits of our cartons

MinaAdams0163 · 22 Aug 2025, 04:30 UTC

Closed
MI
MinaAdams0163
I'm not signing off this layer from a top view. Our filled boxes have load-bearing end sections, but the rotated positions bridge gaps below them. The FR10 tool drawing looks tidy because it has no open fingers. Need the real boxes and the whole tool in the same review.

7 replies

RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to MinaAdams0163

Has packaging marked those end sections on a filled-box drawing?

19 points
MI
MinaAdams0163
Replying to RaviBell0650

Yes, marked bottom view and section. Integrator only used the outside dimensions. Packaging is asking for actual filled samples at the review as well.

14 points
RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to MinaAdams0163

Good. Overlay their support marks before the next animation gets polished.

22 points
AN
AnilAllen0288
Replying to MinaAdams0163

Compare a different pattern if needed, but don't choose it solely because the carton ends look better supported; the tool still needs room to place and leave.

1 points
MI
MinaAdams0163
Replying to AnilAllen0288

A non-rotated option is already proposed. Lower count, better drawn support, awkward opening at the end of a row. No winning picture yet.

16 points
RA
RaviBell0650
Replying to MinaAdams0163

Who owns comparing those two options, including the lower pallet count?

13 points
MI
MinaAdams0163
Replying to RaviBell0650

Integrator owns the combined layout, packaging the filled-case assessment, dispatch the handling cost. I've asked for their comments against one revision before the price is updated. We haven't agreed a pattern.

15 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .