简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

different fr5 fingers delivered against our sample trial

NinaBarnes0588 · 2026年7月1日 18:24 UTC

回复讨论
NI
NinaBarnes0588
Our FR5 arrived with different gripper fingers from the confirmed molded-housing sorting trial; 22 days into asking the unnamed Chinese seller why equivalent has no sample evidence behind it, and I've kept installation and the tooling review paused.

20 条回复

NI
NinaAli0240

What differs in the supplied fingers, and can you link the original trial to its finger reference? Equivalent needs to address the actual housing and nest, not just whether both sets attach to the gripper.

21
NA
NaomiBell0680

Did they test the supplied set at all, Nina Barnes, or send a description of what it should do?

11
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Nina Ali, the supplied fingers have longer lower contact lips and a different reference from the trial drawing; Naomi, no trial with these, only the claim, and the longer lips occupy the nest rim space in the combined drawing.

7
EL
ElenaAllen0340

You can allow a properly scoped alternative assessment without accepting the substitution. I would want it to cover your housing range and existing nest, including release, with responsibility and cost agreed before further work.

18
IM
ImranAdams0131

The original trial cannot establish that longer lips release into the nest. Keep that evidence limited to the identified original fingers

16
OS
OscarAllen0271

Can they still supply the confirmed set? Worth asking before funding a new assessment.

21
NA
NadiaArcher0378

Elena, I'd put the commercial question beside that permission. Nina can consider an alternative, but she shouldn't accidentally commission development simply by asking the seller to substantiate what they've already supplied.

20
PE
Peter_Bailey

Our separate supplier and controls handovers once left the complete-tool problem ownerless, so I would name who owns this remedy rather than accept two people each agreeing to look at their bit.

15
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Oscar, the confirmed fingers can be remade in roughly ten days; the seller instead proposes changing our nest rim for these fingers, and Peter, our integrator will own the application check but hasn't accepted that alteration.

16
ST
StevenCook

Changing the nest is a different proposal, not a demonstration of equivalence. It might be worth considering on its merits, but the seller should explain the full consequences and cost rather than treat your workshop as the missing half of their supplied kit.

10
ZA
ZaraBarnes0569
回复 StevenCook

Steven, agreed, particularly if the nest serves other jobs. I would ask what relies on that rim before anyone calls its removal minor. A small feature can have a much larger audience than the gripper drawing suggests.

21
FE
FelixAllen0284

Is that an existing shared nest, Nina, or tooling still being designed? That would change how I'd compare the two remedies.

11
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Felix and Zara, it's an existing nest used in manual assembly as well; we're retaining it and asking for the confirmed fingers, because we haven't agreed to redesign the shared work around this substitution.

23
NI
NinaAli0240

Then get the remake tied to the confirmed drawing and included components, with carriage addressed. That makes the remedy specific without asking you to argue that every possible alternative finger would fail.

-2
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Seller has accepted the remake against the trial drawing, including fixings and carriage, at no additional charge; the integrator has the reference and will check the delivered set before the agreed sample comparison.

15
NA
NaomiBell0680

Keep the fixing identification in receiving too. In my stores experience, loose bits are very good at losing their paperwork between the box and the bench.

10
EL
ElenaAllen0340

And confirm the assembled condition for the sample check. Matching the original drawing on receipt is useful, but the handover should still say what was actually checked on your delivered setup.

17
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Remade fingers received with the specified fixing pack, dimensions checked against the confirmed drawing, then fitted by our responsible team; the supervised comparison handled and released the agreed housing samples into the existing nest without the substituted lips' interference, and the check record identifies this assembly.

13
IM
ImranAdams0131

That supports the agreed sample remedy. It does not validate the substituted set, which should remain separately identified rather than enter normal spare stock

17
NI
NinaBarnes0588

Substituted set is segregated for the seller's arranged return, and the remade-set check and updated parts list are in handover; we've closed the supply discrepancy against that remedy, with no nest alteration and no claim for housing variants outside the agreed samples.

22

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。