简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

The FR10 locator result needs its tray-change miss included

LouisAdams0137 · 2026年8月17日 01:57 UTC

回复讨论
LO
LouisAdams0137
Our spacer pickups looked steadier after I added a tray locator. A few supervised runs, then a miss after tray replacement. I can't call that a fix; what should the report preserve?

4 条回复

NA
NaomiArcher0419

Preserve the sequence and the conditions you actually recorded. Which tray was used before and after replacement, whether it was seated against the locator, and what the miss looked like. Unknown details stay unknown; the later miss does not erase the earlier observation, but it limits what you can claim from it.

10
LO
LouisAdams0137

Tray identities retained. Locator contact wasn't recorded after replacement. I wrote more consistent, not measured improvement; important distinction.

13
NA
NaomiArcher0419

Yes. Does the report include the original wording people already saw? A quiet edit can leave the shift repeating a stronger claim than you now intend.

22
LO
LouisAdams0137

Added a dated correction beside the earlier locator note, including the later miss and unrecorded seating. No cause established.

11

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。