Our spacer pickups looked steadier after I added a tray locator. A few supervised runs, then a miss after tray replacement. I can't call that a fix; what should the report preserve?
The FR10 locator result needs its tray-change miss included
LouisAdams0137 · 2026年8月17日 01:57 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Preserve the sequence and the conditions you actually recorded. Which tray was used before and after replacement, whether it was seated against the locator, and what the miss looked like. Unknown details stay unknown; the later miss does not erase the earlier observation, but it limits what you can claim from it.
10分Tray identities retained. Locator contact wasn't recorded after replacement. I wrote more consistent, not measured improvement; important distinction.
13分Yes. Does the report include the original wording people already saw? A quiet edit can leave the shift repeating a stronger claim than you now intend.
22分Added a dated correction beside the earlier locator note, including the later miss and unrecorded seating. No cause established.
11分