The FR10 locator result needs its tray-change miss included

LouisAdams0137 · 17 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC

Reply to discussion
LO
LouisAdams0137
Our spacer pickups looked steadier after I added a tray locator. A few supervised runs, then a miss after tray replacement. I can't call that a fix; what should the report preserve?

4 replies

NA
NaomiArcher0419
Replying to LouisAdams0137

Preserve the sequence and the conditions you actually recorded. Which tray was used before and after replacement, whether it was seated against the locator, and what the miss looked like. Unknown details stay unknown; the later miss does not erase the earlier observation, but it limits what you can claim from it.

10 points
LO
LouisAdams0137
Replying to NaomiArcher0419

Tray identities retained. Locator contact wasn't recorded after replacement. I wrote more consistent, not measured improvement; important distinction.

13 points
NA
NaomiArcher0419
Replying to LouisAdams0137

Yes. Does the report include the original wording people already saw? A quiet edit can leave the shift repeating a stronger claim than you now intend.

22 points
LO
LouisAdams0137
Replying to NaomiArcher0419

Added a dated correction beside the earlier locator note, including the later miss and unrecorded seating. No cause established.

11 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.