The brass blank is reachable in our FR10 proposal, but the model stops at the grip point and omits the open mill door. I have asked for the full quoted tool and a machine survey. Should the first comparison cover the loaded exit and empty return together?
Which complete-tool view should precede our FR10 stand decision?
ThomasBrooks0799 · 2025年9月15日 01:58 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Yes. Do you have the intended blank orientation and full finger-opening geometry as well as the gripper body's closed outline? Those can change the required space on the return.
6分Toolmaker has supplied both, with the adapter and connections. Survey still needs the actual door handle position; the catalogue outline differs from our machine.
23分Has the corrected survey reached the integrator now, Thomas? I would want that confirmed before treating either route as assessed.
19分Corrected survey M5 is with them. The initial combined view shows a handle clash. They are comparing another permitted tool orientation before proposing a base move.
15分Will that comparison use the same quoted assembly throughout, with the loaded exit and open-finger return both visible?
12分Give maintenance the candidate too. We found a lovely route that left a service cover with nowhere to go. Doesn't mean abandon the position, but it belongs in the decision before the stand becomes steel.
-7分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .