简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which complete-tool view should precede our FR10 stand decision?

ThomasBrooks0799 · 2025年9月15日 01:58 UTC

已关闭
TH
ThomasBrooks0799
The brass blank is reachable in our FR10 proposal, but the model stops at the grip point and omits the open mill door. I have asked for the full quoted tool and a machine survey. Should the first comparison cover the loaded exit and empty return together?

6 条回复

NA
NadiaCarter0987

Yes. Do you have the intended blank orientation and full finger-opening geometry as well as the gripper body's closed outline? Those can change the required space on the return.

6
TH
ThomasBrooks0799

Toolmaker has supplied both, with the adapter and connections. Survey still needs the actual door handle position; the catalogue outline differs from our machine.

23
NA
NadiaCarter0987

Has the corrected survey reached the integrator now, Thomas? I would want that confirmed before treating either route as assessed.

19
TH
ThomasBrooks0799

Corrected survey M5 is with them. The initial combined view shows a handle clash. They are comparing another permitted tool orientation before proposing a base move.

15
NA
NadiaCarter0987

Will that comparison use the same quoted assembly throughout, with the loaded exit and open-finger return both visible?

12
LI
LinAbbott0009

Give maintenance the candidate too. We found a lovely route that left a service cover with nowhere to go. Doesn't mean abandon the position, but it belongs in the decision before the stand becomes steel.

-7

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .