Which complete-tool view should precede our FR10 stand decision?

ThomasBrooks0799 · 15 Sept 2025, 01:58 UTC

Closed
TH
ThomasBrooks0799
The brass blank is reachable in our FR10 proposal, but the model stops at the grip point and omits the open mill door. I have asked for the full quoted tool and a machine survey. Should the first comparison cover the loaded exit and empty return together?

6 replies

NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to ThomasBrooks0799

Yes. Do you have the intended blank orientation and full finger-opening geometry as well as the gripper body's closed outline? Those can change the required space on the return.

6points
TH
ThomasBrooks0799
Replying to NadiaCarter0987

Toolmaker has supplied both, with the adapter and connections. Survey still needs the actual door handle position; the catalogue outline differs from our machine.

23points
NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to ThomasBrooks0799

Has the corrected survey reached the integrator now, Thomas? I would want that confirmed before treating either route as assessed.

19points
TH
ThomasBrooks0799
Replying to NadiaCarter0987

Corrected survey M5 is with them. The initial combined view shows a handle clash. They are comparing another permitted tool orientation before proposing a base move.

15points
NA
NadiaCarter0987
Replying to ThomasBrooks0799

Will that comparison use the same quoted assembly throughout, with the loaded exit and open-finger return both visible?

12points
LI
LinAbbott0009
Replying to ThomasBrooks0799

Give maintenance the candidate too. We found a lovely route that left a service cover with nowhere to go. Doesn't mean abandon the position, but it belongs in the decision before the stand becomes steel.

-7points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .