A new steel-blank removal proposal has repeated the missing-door problem I asked about earlier. Blank shown at the fixture, gripper body absent, open door absent. I'm calling this an initial layout until those are included. What should I ask to see between gripping the blank and actually getting it clear of the mill?
The FR10 blank exits through another missing-door model
HazelBrown0919 · 2025年10月13日 00:32 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
10 条回复
The whole loaded withdrawal, including any turn through the opening, with the complete tool and real door geometry. Also the empty-tool route. Two clear end poses can hide a collision halfway between them.
20分Who supplied the opening dimensions?
18分回复 RickShift
Rick, the layout drafter used a sales outline. Machine owner hasn't confirmed the opening. That needs fixing before the route check, not after.
12分Does the proposed tool have its adapter and fittings defined yet?
13分GabrielAli, that's the other half. A measured opening and an invented gripper still make an invented clearance result. Get both owners supplying the actual candidate assemblies to the integrator.
7分Include the setter's fixture-change access on that layout
14分GabrielAli, fingers are proposed but the adapter isn't defined. GabrielBell, I've asked the toolmaker for the complete assembly and the machine owner for the door survey. Rick, setter will review the same candidate.
21分Any reason that adapter is still undecided? It might change the intended grip position.
11分And don't let a longer adapter inherit the old load assessment. The complete tool with held blank needs checking against the applicable limits, not just squeezing through the opening.
12分No stand order yet, I hope
9分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .