Packaging revised our rotated cartons. Tooling still shows the old gaps. Cannot write one changeover instruction from both
Cannot sign off the FR5 pallet changeover with two layer diagrams
Morgan_Blair · 2025年11月1日 21:11 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
回复 Morgan_Blair
Which difference affects the person changing it over? I would mark that on the two drawings first, especially if somebody has called the packaging change minor without showing what moved.
22分回复 Morgan_Blair
The robot program matters too. A new operator diagram beside an old placement pattern would be a particularly unhelpful combination. Has the integrator actually received the packaging revision?
12分Farah, two cartons rotate differently. Lucy, integrator has it. Finger withdrawal review still uses the old one.
23分回复 Morgan_Blair
Who is issuing the combined revision?
15分回复 Morgan_Blair
We had the old diagram survive in a laminated sheet after everyone updated their files. When this is settled, collect the old bench copies as well.
11分Henry, useful warning, but Morgan cannot replace them with an unresolved pattern either. I would mark the proposed changeover unavailable until the tool review catches up. Is the existing arrangement still the intended one for current work?
10分No robot palletising in use yet. Manual packing continues. Integrator owns the combined issue, Rosa.
10分回复 Morgan_Blair
Then keep those two activities distinct in the handover. People packing manually need their valid instructions; the unapproved robot pattern should not quietly become the replacement because it looks newer.
1分Does the manual method even use the proposed layer pattern?
0分回复 RosaAli0205
Different pattern. New robot drawing now under joint review. Manual sheet stays. Thanks Henry for the laminated-copy warning.
12分回复 Morgan_Blair
Glad that part helps. Ours was tucked behind a cabinet door, which apparently made it immune to every document update we sent.
25分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .