简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
Morgan_Blair · 2025年11月1日 21:11 UTC
Which difference affects the person changing it over? I would mark that on the two drawings first, especially if somebody has called the packaging change minor without showing what moved.
22分The robot program matters too. A new operator diagram beside an old placement pattern would be a particularly unhelpful combination. Has the integrator actually received the packaging revision?
12分Farah, two cartons rotate differently. Lucy, integrator has it. Finger withdrawal review still uses the old one.
23分Who is issuing the combined revision?
15分We had the old diagram survive in a laminated sheet after everyone updated their files. When this is settled, collect the old bench copies as well.
11分Henry, useful warning, but Morgan cannot replace them with an unresolved pattern either. I would mark the proposed changeover unavailable until the tool review catches up. Is the existing arrangement still the intended one for current work?
10分No robot palletising in use yet. Manual packing continues. Integrator owns the combined issue, Rosa.
10分Then keep those two activities distinct in the handover. People packing manually need their valid instructions; the unapproved robot pattern should not quietly become the replacement because it looks newer.
1分Does the manual method even use the proposed layer pattern?
0分Different pattern. New robot drawing now under joint review. Manual sheet stays. Thanks Henry for the laminated-copy warning.
12分Glad that part helps. Ours was tucked behind a cabinet door, which apparently made it immune to every document update we sent.
25分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .