简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

the travelling scratch

SamBennett0768 · 2025年5月11日 15:40 UTC

已关闭
SA
SamBennett0768
Our FR10 inspection examples show a bright line wandering across the same bezel as its angle changes, and somebody has labelled every image scratched. Still have the bezel, no agreed physical verdict. Can we sort that on the bench before buying more lighting?

5 条回复

TH
ThomasBrooks0799

Who inspected the bezel before it became a reject reference? Find that person or ask quality to examine it now. I would leave the images unclassified until the physical part has a clear status.

22
SA
SamBennett0768

Nobody. The label came from the first photo.

7
TH
ThomasBrooks0799

Then the image label is where to start. Keep the same part available for a comparison under controlled viewing and presentation. You can investigate the moving reflection while quality decides whether the surface is acceptable.

7
SA
SamBennett0768

Quality has it now, along with two known good bezels. They've asked us to stop filling the reject folder until the samples are agreed. Fair request, slightly embarrassing folder.

18
TH
ThomasBrooks0799

Did they find a physical mark at the bright line's original position? I'm interested in whether you had reflection alone or reflection over a real defect.

10

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .