Our FR10 inspection examples show a bright line wandering across the same bezel as its angle changes, and somebody has labelled every image scratched. Still have the bezel, no agreed physical verdict. Can we sort that on the bench before buying more lighting?
the travelling scratch
SamBennett0768 · 2025年5月11日 15:40 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
5 条回复
Who inspected the bezel before it became a reject reference? Find that person or ask quality to examine it now. I would leave the images unclassified until the physical part has a clear status.
22分Nobody. The label came from the first photo.
7分Then the image label is where to start. Keep the same part available for a comparison under controlled viewing and presentation. You can investigate the moving reflection while quality decides whether the surface is acceptable.
7分Quality has it now, along with two known good bezels. They've asked us to stop filling the reject folder until the samples are agreed. Fair request, slightly embarrassing folder.
18分Did they find a physical mark at the bright line's original position? I'm interested in whether you had reflection alone or reflection over a real defect.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .