The UR5e interface guide names a different supplied assembly

The contact says the assembly name changed, but has not supplied a revision comparison or confirmed the pictured connections. I've asked for that link explicitly.

A name change could be harmless. I'd still want the technical confirmation in writing before treating it that way, especially when the picture is what you're supposed to connect from.

Yes. We are not treating the renamed description as an installation instruction. The commissioning technician has the photos and both guide versions.

Our interface review once used two names for different events, so a claim that two names mean one thing is worth asking the owner to demonstrate rather than accepting from the cover page.

Caleb, has the contact identified which guide revision applies to the delivered markings, or only explained the change of name so far?

Only the name so far. We still need the applicable revision and confirmation of the pictured arrangement.

Then keep the next message that short. Those are two answerable gaps; no need to resend the entire buying history and give sales five easier questions to choose from.

Sent those two points directly to the technical contact. Our technician is waiting on the same answer, and setup has not started.

Please post whether they provide the connection confirmation with the revision. It will be useful to know how the naming change is documented for future replacement parts too.