I've asked the seller for a technical contact and kept the delivered UR5e setup unpowered. The new guide still names a different tool-interface assembly from our external label. The reply says both are used on UR5e, which leaves the actual connection question unanswered.
Ask that contact to confirm the applicable instructions against your specific supplied assembly and cabinet, including the mismatch you found; model compatibility in general is not the missing answer.
The contact says the assembly name changed, but has not supplied a revision comparison or confirmed the pictured connections. I've asked for that link explicitly.
A name change could be harmless. I'd still want the technical confirmation in writing before treating it that way, especially when the picture is what you're supposed to connect from.
Our interface review once used two names for different events, so a claim that two names mean one thing is worth asking the owner to demonstrate rather than accepting from the cover page.
Then keep the next message that short. Those are two answerable gaps; no need to resend the entire buying history and give sales five easier questions to choose from.
Please post whether they provide the connection confirmation with the revision. It will be useful to know how the naming change is documented for future replacement parts too.