Our FR10 transfers the pouch reliably once someone has flattened its seam and put it into the guide; each new pouch shape changes that preparation, and I am struggling to tell whether another guide is sensible development or simply another way to protect the time I have already spent
What should decide whether our FR10 pouch job gets another guide?
KaiCarter0976 · 2025年12月29日 09:22 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Compare the remaining work with the manual process before buying another guide; the time already spent will not be recovered by making the next decision expensive too.
-1分The operator currently prepares each pouch individually, so the robot's clean transfer is only a short part of the task; I had been reporting that short part as the improvement
5分Is one pouch family stable enough to keep, without chasing every new shape?
-1分A restricted scope is worth comparing, Gabriel, provided sorting the work into that scope does not consume the saving.
16分One repeat pouch could be a candidate, but its orders arrive mixed with the changing sizes; we have not costed separating and returning them
20分Then include that sorting before calling the restricted job cheaper.
6分I have paused the request for another guide and asked planning to compare the repeat-only task with the present bench process; keeping the motion available is not a decision to keep developing every pouch
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .