简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

What should decide whether our FR10 pouch job gets another guide?

KaiCarter0976 · 2025年12月29日 09:22 UTC

已关闭
KA
KaiCarter0976
Our FR10 transfers the pouch reliably once someone has flattened its seam and put it into the guide; each new pouch shape changes that preparation, and I am struggling to tell whether another guide is sensible development or simply another way to protect the time I have already spent

7 条回复

DA
DanielBrooks0826

Compare the remaining work with the manual process before buying another guide; the time already spent will not be recovered by making the next decision expensive too.

-1
KA
KaiCarter0976

The operator currently prepares each pouch individually, so the robot's clean transfer is only a short part of the task; I had been reporting that short part as the improvement

5
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Is one pouch family stable enough to keep, without chasing every new shape?

-1
DA
DanielBrooks0826

A restricted scope is worth comparing, Gabriel, provided sorting the work into that scope does not consume the saving.

16
KA
KaiCarter0976

One repeat pouch could be a candidate, but its orders arrive mixed with the changing sizes; we have not costed separating and returning them

20
GA
GabrielAbbott0018

Then include that sorting before calling the restricted job cheaper.

6
KA
KaiCarter0976

I have paused the request for another guide and asked planning to compare the repeat-only task with the present bench process; keeping the motion available is not a decision to keep developing every pouch

15

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .