KaiCarter0976 · 29 Dec 2025, 09:22 UTC
Compare the remaining work with the manual process before buying another guide; the time already spent will not be recovered by making the next decision expensive too.
-1 pointsThe operator currently prepares each pouch individually, so the robot's clean transfer is only a short part of the task; I had been reporting that short part as the improvement
5 pointsIs one pouch family stable enough to keep, without chasing every new shape?
-1 pointsA restricted scope is worth comparing, Gabriel, provided sorting the work into that scope does not consume the saving.
16 pointsOne repeat pouch could be a candidate, but its orders arrive mixed with the changing sizes; we have not costed separating and returning them
20 pointsThen include that sorting before calling the restricted job cheaper.
6 pointsI have paused the request for another guide and asked planning to compare the repeat-only task with the present bench process; keeping the motion available is not a decision to keep developing every pouch
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .