简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
NaomiBrown0941 · 2025年10月14日 20:54 UTC
Can each supplier describe the physical or logical event behind their ready signal without using the word ready? That should expose which two meanings need separate names.
14分Use request received and loading area available as separate states, with owners and conditions.
11分Our training interface had the same agreeable word covering different events. The normal sequence looked fine until we asked what happened when receipt was confirmed but the work could not start.
17分Imran, did they also distinguish completion from acknowledgement?
-8分Both suppliers now describe receipt separately from area availability, and we have added work complete as another event; they still disagree about who owns cancellation after a communication loss.
7分Caleb, yes, receipt and completion needed separate definitions on ours. Naomi's cancellation question sounds like the next missing agreement, not something a rename can settle.
20分Naomi, what can each side establish about an accepted request after the connection returns? Cancellation depends on the state of the work, not merely on the connection having dropped.
6分Keep the ordinary job agreement separate from the independently assessed safety functions.
3分And do not turn an unknown outcome into permission to repeat loading.
12分We have asked both owners to list their retained request and result information for the recovery review; normal wording is agreed, cancellation and reconciliation remain unfinished, and the safety review stays separate.
11分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .