Our FR10 fixture proposal cites final dimensions after correction. No untouched released readings. What can the old records support?
accepted bracket dimensions taken after correction
ClaraChan1046 · 2025年9月7日 08:02 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
They can describe the final accepted condition and the recorded process route, but not the unmeasured condition before correction. Establish the drawing revisions and measurement methods before using any in-jig check as a comparison with the final figures.
12分Final drawing G. Jig card has no method, only aligned. Asked the former inspector what that meant.
2分Also check whether the jig card follows identifiable parts or only the batch, since linking a clamped observation to an individual final result requires more than finding them in the same folder.
20分Is correction labour still in the proposed route? I would keep an allowance while the review is unresolved, rather than assume the robot fixture makes that work disappear.
19分回复 FarahAli0243
Farah, allowance retained. Jig card is batch-level. Inspector remembers a visual seating check, not a measurement.
4分That helps distinguish the stages. Have fabrication and inspection agreed a current-part trial that includes the first released reading before anyone corrects it?
8分回复 FarahAli0243
Include incoming component fit-up in that trial as well, with the actual current revisions, so the fixture designer can assess what the nest is being asked to locate rather than only the shape after welding.
15分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .