ClaraChan1046 · 7 Sept 2025, 08:02 UTC
They can describe the final accepted condition and the recorded process route, but not the unmeasured condition before correction. Establish the drawing revisions and measurement methods before using any in-jig check as a comparison with the final figures.
12 pointsFinal drawing G. Jig card has no method, only aligned. Asked the former inspector what that meant.
2 pointsAlso check whether the jig card follows identifiable parts or only the batch, since linking a clamped observation to an individual final result requires more than finding them in the same folder.
20 pointsIs correction labour still in the proposed route? I would keep an allowance while the review is unresolved, rather than assume the robot fixture makes that work disappear.
19 pointsFarah, allowance retained. Jig card is batch-level. Inspector remembers a visual seating check, not a measurement.
4 pointsThat helps distinguish the stages. Have fabrication and inspection agreed a current-part trial that includes the first released reading before anyone corrects it?
8 pointsInclude incoming component fit-up in that trial as well, with the actual current revisions, so the fixture designer can assess what the nest is being asked to locate rather than only the shape after welding.
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .