简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。

two unsupported positions in our fr10 layer draft

ChloeAdams0135 · 2026年5月6日 01:41 UTC

ChloeAdams01352026年5月6日 01:41 UTC

I've marked two rotated positions where our component cases bridge gaps against their support direction. I want packaging and tooling to assess those together before extending the FR10 pattern review. What else belongs beside that comparison?

6 条回复

BrunoChen11482026年5月7日 09:57 UTC

回复 ChloeAdams0135

The cases underneath and the actual tool opening and withdrawal. Otherwise you fix the support by closing a gap and discover it was the gap the fingers needed. Keep the candidate changes on one identified revision.

16分

ChloeAdams01352026年5月8日 08:22 UTC

回复 BrunoChen1148

Thanks Bruno. I had drawn the two upper cases without the full layer below. I'll include both and the tool route.

11分

KaiBrown08892026年5月9日 06:56 UTC

回复 ChloeAdams0135

Are both positions the same filled case, or different component packs?

16分

ChloeAdams01352026年5月9日 14:26 UTC

回复 KaiBrown0889

Same outer case, different component packs. I hadn't put the fill arrangement on either view.

8分

BrunoChen11482026年5月9日 22:17 UTC

回复 ChloeAdams0135

There is the packaging question, then. Matching outer dimensions don't establish matching support needs. Get both filled conditions identified before anyone presents one as the sample for the other.

12分

LeahCarter10172026年5月10日 10:15 UTC

回复 BrunoChen1148

Those focused views can help define the issue, but any resulting pattern still needs assessment as a complete proposed load. I mean they are a starting point for the review, not a substitute for it.

18分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

注册账号即表示你同意我们的使用条款和社区准则。请阅读我们的隐私政策，了解我们如何处理你的信息。