简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HarishBrown0924 · 2025年12月11日 01:19 UTC
Use the same identified puck for a few comparisons before buying parts. Or rather, keep both the puck and its tray pocket identified; changing both makes a very cheap test surprisingly expensive to interpret.
6分When does it first lean? Before the fingers close?
5分Rick, looks square before closing in the clip but the rear is hidden, so that is not much of an answer yet.
13分Look at the rear. Don't measure the shadow.
3分We chased a similar lean through the tray once. Worn contact on one finger, in our case. A photograph straight down made the part look seated because you couldn't see the little lift at the back.
0分Lin, did it follow the finger across different pockets?
10分Yes. That's what finally got us off the tray theory. Harish hasn't shown that pattern here, though, so I wouldn't send him shopping for our fault.
17分Agreed. Existing video may already show whether the lean favours a direction or a particular pocket. Worth looking before organising another trial.
15分The clips show three pockets and the lean is toward the fixed finger in all three; maintenance also found a loose pad screw during inspection, pad and contact face now being checked.
8分Were those clips all after the same pickup edit?
1分Yes, same edit, not three independent setups; I should have said that.
12分That still gives maintenance a useful direction to investigate. The edited setup will need reviewing with the pad repair, otherwise the adjustment made around the loose pad stays in the comparison.
4分Who is covering this while maintenance has the tool, Harish? We've lost more time to nobody owning the restart than to the actual pad replacement.
19分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .