Am I comparing puck handlers or buying the nicer tray?

BenBrooks0805 · 2025年9月27日 09:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

BE
BenBrooks0805
For a new FR5 puck-loading comparison, one demo uses a purpose-made tray and the other our awkward workshop tray. I like the first result, but can't tell what I'm liking.

19 条回复

MA
MayaBarnes0562

What looks better: fewer misses, easier loading, or just faster movement?

14分
DI
DineshBennett0734

Price the purpose-made tray as part of that option rather than insisting every candidate inherit your old one, because a better tray can be a perfectly reasonable purchase

7分
BE
BenBrooks0805

Maya, faster movement and less attention from the demonstrator. No comparable miss totals. Dinesh, I'm open to new trays if their preparation doesn't become our new job.

15分
RE
RebeccaAli0256

I'm with Dinesh. Same input conditions for judging the arms, yes. But you're buying a working arrangement, not awarding a medal to an arm.

17分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Rebecca, the less-attention claim still needs a look at what happened before filming.

15分
TO
TobyBaker0492

Who loaded the purpose-made tray, Ben? Could the same person show a change to the next tray in the comparison?

8分
DI
DineshBennett0734

Toby's changeover question is useful, and include empty trays coming back to preparation or the nice new tray can become quite an expensive queue

13分
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Maya, absolutely. I meant don't reject new trays merely because the demos used different ones. We still need the whole arrangement priced and tried.

4分
BE
BenBrooks0805

Toby, their technician loaded it. I've asked for replenishment and tray exchange as well as the transfer clip. Thanks for naming the changeover, that was missing from my request.

16分
TO
TobyBaker0492

On nights we once had enough trays for the demonstration and not enough while parts waited for the next operation. Does your quantity estimate include that waiting time?

6分
DI
DineshBennett0734

Exactly, Toby, size the tray pool around the actual flow and turnaround before comparing unit prices

16分
BE
BenBrooks0805

The supplier will quote a tray pool but wants our turnaround estimate. We hadn't measured it. The other supplier will also quote a dedicated tray option now.

9分
RE
RebeccaAli0256

That's turned into a different comparison, in a useful way. Just don't lose the existing-tray price while both offers acquire nicer accessories.

13分
MA
MayaBarnes0562

Ben, are both also showing an interrupted transfer? Smooth runs won't tell you who gets called.

-2分
TO
TobyBaker0492

Maya, I'd want the operator in that demonstration. A supplier technician can make recovery look obvious without saying what they're deciding.

17分
DI
DineshBennett0734

And give the demonstration a common start and finish, otherwise a recovery starting after someone has rearranged the tray dodges the awkward part again

15分
BE
BenBrooks0805

Recovery is in both requests, with our operator invited. No revised videos yet. The new-tray prices alone won't decide this; I'm waiting on the handling and turnaround work too.

13分
RE
RebeccaAli0256

Toby, how did you eventually count your tray pool? Did you track the trays themselves or use the waiting-job list?

5分
TO
TobyBaker0492

We marked the trays and followed them, including the ones people had put aside. The job list missed those. Not very glamorous, but it explained why the supposedly generous spare pile kept vanishing.

15分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .