Can't sign the UR5e check from an overhead clip
Aileen_Bailey · 2025年7月18日 07:21 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
11 条回复
Tell them exactly which two views are missing. Readable package identification and the sample staying in its pocket as the fingers leave.
16分I've asked. They sent a label photo separately and said the clip is the same machine. No tooling identifier on the photo.
12分Ask for the identifiers connected to the demonstration. Another loose photo leaves you doing the joining up.
4分New clip starts at the label and follows the tool. Better. But it cuts before the fingers come out of the tray, so release is still hidden.
23分One demonstration I reviewed ended at placement too. The awkward part was the empty withdrawal. I'd ask for that whole attempt through to a clear view of the placed samples
21分They say showing the filled tray afterwards should be enough. I said we agreed to see the handling, including the tool leaving. Getting tired of asking for five more seconds.
18分Have your acceptance owner send the missing criterion with the agreed trial outline. You can acknowledge the improved identification without signing off the hidden release. That may prevent them treating this as another new request
22分Yes, and stop calling each partial clip almost accepted. That's an invitation to argue about how close they've got.
3分Aileen, is the receiving tray in the clip the one specified for your samples? The final pocket spacing matters when you ask them to show withdrawal.
19分Ravi, that is worth checking. My earlier example used a roomier trial tray, which was part of why the short clip looked convincing.
15分It is our specified tray, checked against the drawing. Purchasing has sent the outstanding release criterion with the original agreement. No complete recording yet, so no acceptance.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .