The FR5 completion survives reconnect and gets counted again

SaraAbbott0026 · 2026年2月19日 05:31 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

SA
SaraAbbott0026
We have agreed who owns the ordinary job signals. This monitor still counts a retained completion again after reconnect. It needs to identify the existing job before updating our plate total.

16 条回复

EM
EmmaChan1072

Does the saved history already contain that job's completion, or is the monitor only carrying forward a total?

14分
SA
SaraAbbott0026

Saved history contains it with the job identity. The connection handler creates an empty list of seen completions on every reconnect.

18分
TH
TheoAbbott0062

Reconcile against the durable history rather than the connection's temporary list. Reconnection is a transport event; it need not create a new inspection or erase knowledge of a completed one.

12分
YA
YasminAli0180

What does the operator see while that reconciliation happens, Sara? I wouldn't leave a fresh-looking total on screen if the application is still deciding what it has already counted.

-3分
NO
NoraBell0670

And does anyone have to press continue? That word can mean almost anything after an interruption.

17分
SA
SaraAbbott0026

It currently shows connected and the old total immediately. No operator button. Developer is adding a reconciling indication before the current total is presented.

6分
EM
EmmaChan1072

What happens if the retained completion has an identity absent from the saved history? It could be work completed while the monitor was away.

21分
TH
TheoAbbott0062

That case needs a defined reconciliation rule. Absence from the local completed set is not enough to treat an arbitrary retained state as a new authorised result. Compare it with the persisted pending job too.

4分
YA
YasminAli0180

Theo, would you show that unknown case separately from the duplicate one? For a covering operator, one is already accounted for and the other needs somebody to decide what happened.

13分
TH
TheoAbbott0062

Yes. A known duplicate should settle without requiring the operator to untangle it. An unmatched retained result should remain visible as unresolved, with its identity available to the responsible person.

8分
SA
SaraAbbott0026

Revised tests distinguish already-recorded completion, completion matching a pending job, and unmatched retained state. No clearing or resubmission used to make the examples pass.

3分
NO
NoraBell0670

Who takes the unmatched case when you're absent, Sara? A nice unresolved label can still leave the next person stranded.

0分
SA
SaraAbbott0026

Shift lead uses the agreed reconciliation route with controls when needed. The walkthrough found that contact missing from the page; it is there now, beside the unresolved job identity.

14分
EM
EmmaChan1072

Have repeated reconnects stopped increasing the count yet?

9分
SA
SaraAbbott0026

Yes. Repeated reconnects and full application restart preserve the correct total from saved history. Pending-job completion records once; unmatched state stays unresolved. The tested monitor correction is installed and this duplicate-count fault is closed.

5分
YA
YasminAli0180

Thanks for including what the covering operator sees. That's usually the detail I have to ask for after the software fix is declared finished.

24分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .