The FR5 completion survives reconnect and gets counted again
SaraAbbott0026 · 19 Feb 2026, 05:31 UTC
16 replies
Does the saved history already contain that job's completion, or is the monitor only carrying forward a total?
14pointsSaved history contains it with the job identity. The connection handler creates an empty list of seen completions on every reconnect.
18pointsReconcile against the durable history rather than the connection's temporary list. Reconnection is a transport event; it need not create a new inspection or erase knowledge of a completed one.
12pointsWhat does the operator see while that reconciliation happens, Sara? I wouldn't leave a fresh-looking total on screen if the application is still deciding what it has already counted.
-3pointsAnd does anyone have to press continue? That word can mean almost anything after an interruption.
17pointsIt currently shows connected and the old total immediately. No operator button. Developer is adding a reconciling indication before the current total is presented.
6pointsWhat happens if the retained completion has an identity absent from the saved history? It could be work completed while the monitor was away.
21pointsThat case needs a defined reconciliation rule. Absence from the local completed set is not enough to treat an arbitrary retained state as a new authorised result. Compare it with the persisted pending job too.
4pointsTheo, would you show that unknown case separately from the duplicate one? For a covering operator, one is already accounted for and the other needs somebody to decide what happened.
13pointsYes. A known duplicate should settle without requiring the operator to untangle it. An unmatched retained result should remain visible as unresolved, with its identity available to the responsible person.
8pointsRevised tests distinguish already-recorded completion, completion matching a pending job, and unmatched retained state. No clearing or resubmission used to make the examples pass.
3pointsWho takes the unmatched case when you're absent, Sara? A nice unresolved label can still leave the next person stranded.
0pointsShift lead uses the agreed reconciliation route with controls when needed. The walkthrough found that contact missing from the page; it is there now, beside the unresolved job identity.
14pointsHave repeated reconnects stopped increasing the count yet?
9pointsYes. Repeated reconnects and full application restart preserve the correct total from saved history. Pending-job completion records once; unmatched state stays unresolved. The tested monitor correction is installed and this duplicate-count fault is closed.
5pointsThanks for including what the covering operator sees. That's usually the detail I have to ask for after the software fix is declared finished.
24pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .