The refurbished FR5 listing never says what was inspected

ThomasBell0625 · 2026年5月11日 17:31 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

TH
ThomasBell0625
Tempting FR5 price for our puck transfer. Inspected, apparently. What should I see before paying for collection?

20 条回复

ME
MeiBennett0777

The identified package and what its inspection covered, with findings and unresolved items. A moving demonstration doesn't establish condition or suitability for your puck-transfer job.

21分
TH
ThomasBell0625

Seller sent a short motion video. No inspection scope, and pendant identity isn't visible.

14分
BE
BenBrown0892

That's a video, then. Ask for the arm, controller and pendant identities together, and what was replaced or repaired. Cheap kit gets less charming when nobody can tell you which bits belong with it.

21分
IM
ImranBrooks0827

Include the software and available backup information in that package description. The person taking over needs to know what can be restored and which documentation applies, not merely that someone made it move for a camera.

7分
JA
JamieChan1078

I'd get a price for an independent inspection before booking transport; otherwise the collection cost becomes your reason to ignore the missing answers.

24分
OW
OwenBaker0486

Jamie, agreed, although the assessor needs the actual package description before quoting a meaningful visit rather than another general look at it.

16分
JA
JaneBaker0510

And can you walk away after that inspection? Ask before spending on it.

3分
IM
ImranBennett0740

Price the handover and support you need too; a lower purchase price may still suit you, but it should not assume your operator arrives knowing an inherited configuration.

7分
TH
ThomasBell0625

Identities supplied. Seller admits inspected meant a basic functional check, not a documented refurbishment assessment.

20分
MO
Morgan_Carr

What refurbishment work can they actually identify, then?

1分
MA
MayaBrooks0823

Thomas, keep the puck job cost separate from buying a usable package; you still need the trays and tooling even if the inspection is encouraging.

7分
RE
ReeceAllen0297

I wouldn't reject it solely because the original check was narrow. I would reject the idea that narrow means complete. A defined independent assessment could still make the decision possible, if the seller will allow it and the cost makes sense.

2分
BE
BenBrown0892

Reece, yes, but I wouldn't pay to discover basic identities they could send for free. Thomas has those now, so at least the assessor can arrive looking at the same package everyone priced.

21分
TH
ThomasBell0625

Seller identifies replaced cables but no wider overhaul. Independent assessor has quoted a defined visit; seller permits it.

20分
JA
JaneBaker0510

Permits it, fine. Have you agreed what happens if you decline the purchase?

16分
TH
ThomasBell0625

Yes. No purchase commitment for the inspection visit; our inspection fee stays ours if we decline.

12分
ME
MeiBennett0777

That leaves a decision you can price. Make sure the assessor's scope includes the specific package concerns, without treating it as approval of your eventual cell.

20分
OW
OwenBaker0486

Did the visit uncover anything that changes the total, Thomas?

0分
TH
ThomasBell0625

Visit found connector damage needing repair and no usable configuration backup. Repair, setup and our tooling erase the saving. Purchase declined.

12分
IM
ImranBennett0740

A useful outcome for the inspection fee, even if it is disappointing; you avoided inheriting the unexplained setup as an operator-training problem.

7分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。