The refurbished FR5 listing never says what was inspected

ThomasBell0625 · 11 May 2026, 17:31 UTC

Reply to discussion
TH
ThomasBell0625
Tempting FR5 price for our puck transfer. Inspected, apparently. What should I see before paying for collection?

20 replies

ME
MeiBennett0777
Replying to ThomasBell0625

The identified package and what its inspection covered, with findings and unresolved items. A moving demonstration doesn't establish condition or suitability for your puck-transfer job.

21 points
TH
ThomasBell0625
Replying to MeiBennett0777

Seller sent a short motion video. No inspection scope, and pendant identity isn't visible.

14 points
BE
BenBrown0892
Replying to ThomasBell0625

That's a video, then. Ask for the arm, controller and pendant identities together, and what was replaced or repaired. Cheap kit gets less charming when nobody can tell you which bits belong with it.

21 points
IM
ImranBrooks0827
Replying to ThomasBell0625

Include the software and available backup information in that package description. The person taking over needs to know what can be restored and which documentation applies, not merely that someone made it move for a camera.

7 points
JA
JamieChan1078
Replying to ThomasBell0625

I'd get a price for an independent inspection before booking transport; otherwise the collection cost becomes your reason to ignore the missing answers.

24 points
OW
OwenBaker0486
Replying to JamieChan1078

Jamie, agreed, although the assessor needs the actual package description before quoting a meaningful visit rather than another general look at it.

16 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to JamieChan1078

And can you walk away after that inspection? Ask before spending on it.

3 points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to ThomasBell0625

Price the handover and support you need too; a lower purchase price may still suit you, but it should not assume your operator arrives knowing an inherited configuration.

7 points
TH
ThomasBell0625
Replying to BenBrown0892

Identities supplied. Seller admits inspected meant a basic functional check, not a documented refurbishment assessment.

20 points
MO
Morgan_Carr
Replying to ThomasBell0625

What refurbishment work can they actually identify, then?

1 points
MA
MayaBrooks0823
Replying to ThomasBell0625

Thomas, keep the puck job cost separate from buying a usable package; you still need the trays and tooling even if the inspection is encouraging.

7 points
RE
ReeceAllen0297
Replying to ThomasBell0625

I wouldn't reject it solely because the original check was narrow. I would reject the idea that narrow means complete. A defined independent assessment could still make the decision possible, if the seller will allow it and the cost makes sense.

2 points
BE
BenBrown0892
Replying to ReeceAllen0297

Reece, yes, but I wouldn't pay to discover basic identities they could send for free. Thomas has those now, so at least the assessor can arrive looking at the same package everyone priced.

21 points
TH
ThomasBell0625
Replying to Morgan_Carr

Seller identifies replaced cables but no wider overhaul. Independent assessor has quoted a defined visit; seller permits it.

20 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to ThomasBell0625

Permits it, fine. Have you agreed what happens if you decline the purchase?

16 points
TH
ThomasBell0625
Replying to JaneBaker0510

Yes. No purchase commitment for the inspection visit; our inspection fee stays ours if we decline.

12 points
ME
MeiBennett0777
Replying to ThomasBell0625

That leaves a decision you can price. Make sure the assessor's scope includes the specific package concerns, without treating it as approval of your eventual cell.

20 points
OW
OwenBaker0486
Replying to ThomasBell0625

Did the visit uncover anything that changes the total, Thomas?

0 points
TH
ThomasBell0625
Replying to OwenBaker0486

Visit found connector damage needing repair and no usable configuration backup. Repair, setup and our tooling erase the saving. Purchase declined.

12 points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to ThomasBell0625

A useful outcome for the inspection fee, even if it is disappointing; you avoided inheriting the unexplained setup as an operator-training problem.

7 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.