Door survey is done. Two gripper proposals, but the returned access sketch uses only the fingers from one. I need complete candidates before the arm choice moves any further.
Which complete FR10 tool belongs in our polymer-blank removal check?
PriyaBell0655 · 2026年2月16日 04:37 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
18 条回复
Who is supplying the missing body, adapter and connection details for each candidate?
20分Each tool supplier. One has returned a full assembly. Other still sends a finger drawing and says the body is standard.
-1分Standard isn't a dimension. Ask them to identify the actual body and fittings. The integrator can't compare a complete tool with an invisible one and give you a useful choice.
6分Include room to remove the tool connections for service, not only room for them to fit.
17分Is the setter's fixture-change route shown with either candidate? The tool might leave happily while the person changing the job still has nowhere to put the removed fixture.
10分Carla, setter route is marked for both. Luis, service access added to the request. Second supplier has named the body but still owes its connection arrangement.
13分Can the complete candidate be checked while you're waiting for the other?
14分Yes. Integrator checked it against the surveyed door and found a clash during loaded withdrawal. Asking whether another orientation from that base is possible.
3分Worth asking before moving the stand. Does the blank have to leave straight initially? A rotated drawing can hide a locating feature that won't release that way.
2分回复 MiaAllen0296
Straight until clear of the fixture lip. Integrator has kept that constraint; no magic early turn.
2分Does the alternative orientation also allow the empty tool to return?
11分Loaded route revised and clear in the model. Empty return conflicts with a rear fitting. We have not selected this candidate.
5分Did the second supplier ever complete its assembly? You might learn more by comparing it now than repeatedly adjusting the first tool, though it may bring its own problem.
20分Carla's question is fair. The first supplier answering faster doesn't make its geometry your permanent starting point.
17分Second assembly arrived. Its loaded withdrawal is clear, but an open finger conflicts with the fixture on return. Both candidates have specific failed paths now.
17分At least those are real alternatives being checked, not one tool getting all the scrutiny while the other keeps an imaginary clean record.
8分Integrator is comparing revised returns for both, with service and setter access retained. Thanks, Hana, asking who owed the missing details finally got the second supplier to finish them.
11分Please report which complete route survives. The tool removal check still matters after that.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .