PriyaBell0655 · 16 Feb 2026, 04:37 UTC
Who is supplying the missing body, adapter and connection details for each candidate?
20 pointsEach tool supplier. One has returned a full assembly. Other still sends a finger drawing and says the body is standard.
-1 pointsStandard isn't a dimension. Ask them to identify the actual body and fittings. The integrator can't compare a complete tool with an invisible one and give you a useful choice.
6 pointsInclude room to remove the tool connections for service, not only room for them to fit.
17 pointsIs the setter's fixture-change route shown with either candidate? The tool might leave happily while the person changing the job still has nowhere to put the removed fixture.
10 pointsCarla, setter route is marked for both. Luis, service access added to the request. Second supplier has named the body but still owes its connection arrangement.
13 pointsCan the complete candidate be checked while you're waiting for the other?
14 pointsYes. Integrator checked it against the surveyed door and found a clash during loaded withdrawal. Asking whether another orientation from that base is possible.
3 pointsWorth asking before moving the stand. Does the blank have to leave straight initially? A rotated drawing can hide a locating feature that won't release that way.
2 pointsStraight until clear of the fixture lip. Integrator has kept that constraint; no magic early turn.
2 pointsDoes the alternative orientation also allow the empty tool to return?
11 pointsLoaded route revised and clear in the model. Empty return conflicts with a rear fitting. We have not selected this candidate.
5 pointsDid the second supplier ever complete its assembly? You might learn more by comparing it now than repeatedly adjusting the first tool, though it may bring its own problem.
20 pointsCarla's question is fair. The first supplier answering faster doesn't make its geometry your permanent starting point.
17 pointsSecond assembly arrived. Its loaded withdrawal is clear, but an open finger conflicts with the fixture on return. Both candidates have specific failed paths now.
17 pointsAt least those are real alternatives being checked, not one tool getting all the scrutiny while the other keeps an imaginary clean record.
8 pointsIntegrator is comparing revised returns for both, with service and setter access retained. Thanks, Hana, asking who owed the missing details finally got the second supplier to finish them.
11 pointsPlease report which complete route survives. The tool removal check still matters after that.
10 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .