简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AnilBrown0897 · 2026年5月25日 06:14 UTC
@AnilBrown0897 Have you listed tray adjustments separately from missed pickups? Comparing those observations could show how much of the apparent transfer performance depended on preparation.
18分Barely, but yes. The notes catch nudges the clips don't show clearly. Across the candidates, most misses followed tray replacement.
7分@AnilBrown0897 Use those notes to plan a common tray trial, including normal replacement. Agree what counts as acceptable placement and operator help, then record both for each candidate.
10分We had a separate transfer application where the locating step was awkward, but the continuous run looked fine. A tray replacement by another operator exposed it.
15分@AmaraBrooks0861 Robot cost or fixture cost? Our meeting keeps getting stuck there.
17分In my own comparison, we included the cost in the complete package and identified its source as fixture work. How we categorised it didn't change the need to fund it.
11分Keeping the same gripper would make the comparison fair too. That removes another variable while you sort out the tray issue.
21分@JamieChan1078 Same gripper, unfair adapter? That's still a skewed comparison if the mounting suits one arm better.
7分Fair correction; I overstated that. Keep the gripping requirement consistent, document adapters and tuning, and assess the actual proposed tools where a shared gripper would distort things.
22分@JamieChan1078 Does that mean a candidate can arrive with a custom fixture and still be compared? I'm trying to understand where the boundary goes.
18分