Our FR5 fixture review has aligned-under-restraint notes and failed released dimensions, but no paired numerical restrained readings; how should I retain the useful history without making the unexplained correction our new process?
Released bracket readings with no matching restrained measurement
LinChan1053 · 2026年6月30日 01:18 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
回复 LinChan1053
What does the final acceptance follow: the first released check or a separate correction?
12分A separate correction. The route lists it between released inspection and final acceptance, but gives no bracket-level before-and-after readings or method for that operation
19分回复 LinChan1053
Then keep that whole route visible in the estimate, with correction and reinspection as distinct work, and have quality define a new traceable study if the old records cannot explain the released result
3分回复 LinChan1053
Can quality identify the support used for the old released measurement?
8分Not from these sheets. I've separated the documented sequence from missing measurement conditions, with incoming fit-up, locating scheme and released acceptance listed as questions for the new study
21分回复 LinChan1053
Keep those as questions until their owners answer them, Lin; a new worksheet is useful, but filling its blank stages from assumptions would recreate the same unexplained success story in cleaner handwriting
8分