Start with the welding lead and whoever signed the final inspection. The word alone doesn't tell you what was done or how they judged it finished.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
The old bracket check says fine, then says bend it
RebeccaAllen0343 · 2025年4月19日 12:05 UTC
18 条回复
Final inspector is still here. The setter who did the correction has retired. Typical timing.
11分Does the inspector have the actual readings?
9分Also ask whether correction was routine or limited to particular batches; that changes how much hidden work your new production plan may be inheriting.
10分Useful distinction. A single rework case isn't the normal cycle.
13分Found it on several batches. Still can't tell whether every bracket needed it or somebody copied the note across the traveller.
4分Then leave that frequency unknown for now.
6分Do the sheets identify the bracket before and after correction? We had batch totals that couldn't tell us whether a recheck was the same piece.
15分Keep the pre-correction and final readings separate when transcribing them. The final accepted value is useful, but replacing the earlier value would erase the problem you are trying to understand.
20分Yes, don't tidy the awkward bit out of the data.
9分Inspector has a notebook with individual IDs and final readings. No matching measurements before correction. I've asked him about the gap, not filled it in from the batch sheet.
5分That's useful final evidence, although it won't tell you how much correction each bracket needed. Has the welding lead found a written method?
8分Not yet. He remembers the setter using a separate bench fixture, which isn't on our equipment list.
6分Find that fixture before budgeting away the setter's job.
14分Stores thinks it may be in the old tooling rack. I've asked them to identify it properly; not dragging out the first vaguely bracket-shaped thing.
13分Could the inspector recognise it from a photo? That might narrow the search before someone moves heavy tooling around.
3分Good idea, he's looking at the rack photos with stores. The review now lists an unexplained correction and possibly missing tooling. Less tidy than our original plan, more honest.
20分Worth finding now. Post back if they locate it; curious what that little word was hiding.
5分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .