Our two housing-transfer proposals use different finger extensions, yet both suitability statements quote the bare housing mass; who should supply and assess the complete loaded assembly information before we choose one?
One supplier will provide the complete mass, centre of gravity and inertia information, but says the integrator owns application assessment; the other has only repeated the housing mass.
Has the second supplier actually included the finger extensions in its quoted assembly? I would ask that before assuming its repeated housing mass describes the same proposal you have drawn.