Our two housing-transfer proposals use different finger extensions, yet both suitability statements quote the bare housing mass; who should supply and assess the complete loaded assembly information before we choose one?
I cannot choose between FR10 tools without the loaded assembly details
NaomiBennett0767 · 2026年3月10日 19:14 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
4 条回复
Ask each tool supplier for its assembly data and name who assesses it for the proposed robot motion.
19分One supplier will provide the complete mass, centre of gravity and inertia information, but says the integrator owns application assessment; the other has only repeated the housing mass.
1分Get the integrator to accept that assessment scope explicitly, including the adapter and hose arrangement.
11分Has the second supplier actually included the finger extensions in its quoted assembly? I would ask that before assuming its repeated housing mass describes the same proposal you have drawn.
3分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .