简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

I cannot choose between FR10 tools without the loaded assembly details

NaomiBennett0767 · 2026年3月10日 19:14 UTC

回复讨论
NA
NaomiBennett0767
Our two housing-transfer proposals use different finger extensions, yet both suitability statements quote the bare housing mass; who should supply and assess the complete loaded assembly information before we choose one?

4 条回复

AL
AlexAdams0124

Ask each tool supplier for its assembly data and name who assesses it for the proposed robot motion.

19
NA
NaomiBennett0767

One supplier will provide the complete mass, centre of gravity and inertia information, but says the integrator owns application assessment; the other has only repeated the housing mass.

1
AL
AlexAdams0124

Get the integrator to accept that assessment scope explicitly, including the adapter and hose arrangement.

11
RE
ReeceBell0645

Has the second supplier actually included the finger extensions in its quoted assembly? I would ask that before assuming its repeated housing mass describes the same proposal you have drawn.

3

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。