I cannot choose between FR10 tools without the loaded assembly details

NaomiBennett0767 · 10 Mar 2026, 19:14 UTC

Reply to discussion
NA
NaomiBennett0767
Our two housing-transfer proposals use different finger extensions, yet both suitability statements quote the bare housing mass; who should supply and assess the complete loaded assembly information before we choose one?

4 replies

AL
AlexAdams0124
Replying to NaomiBennett0767

Ask each tool supplier for its assembly data and name who assesses it for the proposed robot motion.

19 points
NA
NaomiBennett0767
Replying to AlexAdams0124

One supplier will provide the complete mass, centre of gravity and inertia information, but says the integrator owns application assessment; the other has only repeated the housing mass.

1 points
AL
AlexAdams0124
Replying to NaomiBennett0767

Get the integrator to accept that assessment scope explicitly, including the adapter and hose arrangement.

11 points
RE
ReeceBell0645
Replying to NaomiBennett0767

Has the second supplier actually included the finger extensions in its quoted assembly? I would ask that before assuming its repeated housing mass describes the same proposal you have drawn.

3 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.