what is the minimum useful fault-photo index

AlistairBurke · 2026年9月19日 15:18 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

AL
AlistairBurke
I am going to trial a plain list for robot-support photos instead of hoping the shift chat search behaves. Cell, date and incident are the obvious columns, but I am wary of making a little database that no one updates at two in the morning. What one extra field has actually helped you find the right image later?

3 条回复

OL
OliverBennett0711

A plain description of what the photo shows. Not a fault diagnosis, just 'rear connector before refit' or similar. Cell and date narrow it down, but that one line stops you opening twenty nearly identical panel photos.

0分
HA
HarishAbbott0054

And keep a link or location, rather than pasting the image into the list again. Otherwise the index becomes the second place where a picture can go missing. Boring, but it has saved us a lot of scrolling.

0分
AL
AlistairBurke

Description and location, then. That is small enough to try without making the night shift fill out a form for every slightly unhappy cable. I will see whether we can find an old incident from the list before adding anything else.

0分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。