I want to drop the rotated layer from our FR5 proposal. Our filled cartons have two support strips underneath, and the rotated drawing puts one strip partly above a finger channel. Packaging has shown me the problem on a section, so this isn't another argument about how pretty the pattern looks.
The straight arrangement carries fewer cartons per layer. I can live with that if the full stack and tool withdrawal work, but dispatch is treating the original carton count as something sacred. What else should we compare before I push the lower-count option?
Can our FR5 keep every filled carton facing the same way?
CarlaChen1184 · 2026年4月7日 07:42 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Compare the whole stack, not just a better first layer.
18分That's the missing drawing. We have a straight first layer and then the old rotated layers pasted above it. I hadn't noticed until I tried to count them.
2分Send it back. Nobody can assess the stack you actually want from that.
8分Would the lower count mean another pallet for your usual dispatch quantity? Could still be worthwhile, but give dispatch the real difference rather than just telling them to like fewer cartons.
0分Fair question. Add finished pallet height and the actual removal arrangement to that comparison.
17分Robin, one common order needs an extra pallet with the straight layout. Dispatch wasn't just being awkward. Packaging is willing to review that complete stack, and tooling has the filled-carton sections. I've asked costing to include the extra pallet handling instead of burying it.
21分That's a useful disagreement now. I wouldn't buy back the carton count by adding a support sheet unless someone also owns getting that sheet in and out.
14分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .