I need the actual packed product box under the proposed turned row. The supplied section shows continuous support, while the lower-layer drawing has a finger gap beneath a required bearing edge. Before I accept the FR5 pattern, who should reconcile those two views?
Have the integration lead bring packaging and tooling onto one identified carton and layer revision. Mark the required bearing edges in the section and keep the full placement and finger withdrawal with it. We have lost too much time to different versions answering different questions.
Lead has both drawings. Packaging says its section predates the wider finger gap. Tooling says the gap was increased for withdrawal. Neither reviewed the other's change.