I need the actual packed product box under the proposed turned row. The supplied section shows continuous support, while the lower-layer drawing has a finger gap beneath a required bearing edge. Before I accept the FR5 pattern, who should reconcile those two views?
Which support section belongs under our FR5 turned boxes?
IsaacBrown0955 · 2026年4月13日 17:53 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Have the integration lead bring packaging and tooling onto one identified carton and layer revision. Mark the required bearing edges in the section and keep the full placement and finger withdrawal with it. We have lost too much time to different versions answering different questions.
12分Lead has both drawings. Packaging says its section predates the wider finger gap. Tooling says the gap was increased for withdrawal. Neither reviewed the other's change.
2分Has packaging judged the revised gap with the filled box now, Isaac?
10分Do not issue the older pattern while they reconcile it; a warning beneath an obsolete picture still leaves operators with the obsolete picture.
1分Isaac, did the combined review produce an alternative, or are they still assessing the support conflict?
7分And does any proposed alternative change the ordinary short-order ending, Isaac? That needs a support check as well.
10分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .