I need the actual packed product box under the proposed turned row. The supplied section shows continuous support, while the lower-layer drawing has a finger gap beneath a required bearing edge. Before I accept the FR5 pattern, who should reconcile those two views?
Which support section belongs under our FR5 turned boxes?
IsaacBrown0955 · 13 Apr 2026, 17:53 UTC
6 replies
Replying to IsaacBrown0955
Have the integration lead bring packaging and tooling onto one identified carton and layer revision. Mark the required bearing edges in the section and keep the full placement and finger withdrawal with it. We have lost too much time to different versions answering different questions.
12pointsReplying to ElliotCarter1031
Lead has both drawings. Packaging says its section predates the wider finger gap. Tooling says the gap was increased for withdrawal. Neither reviewed the other's change.
2pointsReplying to IsaacBrown0955
Has packaging judged the revised gap with the filled box now, Isaac?
10pointsReplying to IsaacBrown0955
Do not issue the older pattern while they reconcile it; a warning beneath an obsolete picture still leaves operators with the obsolete picture.
1pointsReplying to CallumAllen0273
Isaac, did the combined review produce an alternative, or are they still assessing the support conflict?
7pointsReplying to ElliotCarter1031
And does any proposed alternative change the ordinary short-order ending, Isaac? That needs a support check as well.
10pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .