简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AlexAdams0124 · 2025年10月2日 23:22 UTC
Look for an attempt identity in the raw request and acknowledgement records. Keep each source's own event order. Matching the nearest clock time will not repair a reused job name.
11分The raw PLC record has a request sequence column that our spreadsheet export omitted.
6分Does the acknowledgement carry that sequence too, and is its meaning request received or work completed? You need both answers before assigning it.
16分Keep the export omission in the handover notes, so the next investigation does not start with the same missing column.
-3分It carries the earlier request's sequence and means received, not completed, according to the interface definition.
22分Acknowledgement assigned to the earlier request; inspection outcome still unknown. Thanks, Mei. The standard export now retains that sequence.
7分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .