AlexAdams0124 · 2 Oct 2025, 23:22 UTC
Look for an attempt identity in the raw request and acknowledgement records. Keep each source's own event order. Matching the nearest clock time will not repair a reused job name.
11 pointsThe raw PLC record has a request sequence column that our spreadsheet export omitted.
6 pointsDoes the acknowledgement carry that sequence too, and is its meaning request received or work completed? You need both answers before assigning it.
16 pointsKeep the export omission in the handover notes, so the next investigation does not start with the same missing column.
-3 pointsIt carries the earlier request's sequence and means received, not completed, according to the interface definition.
22 pointsAcknowledgement assigned to the earlier request; inspection outcome still unknown. Thanks, Mei. The standard export now retains that sequence.
7 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .