简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

one acknowledgement, two possible inspection attempts

ClaraBrown0872 · 2026年9月4日 19:57 UTC

回复讨论
CL
ClaraBrown0872
I'm reading the logs from our UR5e fixture inspection after an application restart. Both attempts used the same job label. The acknowledgement could belong to either one, and the PLC clock is behind the laptop. Is there a way to reconstruct this without simply picking the nearest timestamp?

5 条回复

EM
EmmaChan1072

Look for a sequence number or connection session first, because clock proximity can't distinguish two attempts sharing a label. Do any records carry one?

20
CL
ClaraBrown0872

The laptop log has a session start line. The acknowledgement contains only the reused job label and result. PLC records show that label twice, with no attempt number.

18
EM
EmmaChan1072

Then record both possible associations unless another event rules one out. A tidy timeline would look reassuring, but it could still be the wrong story.

8
SA
SaraChen1157

We once found useful ordering in a connection-close record. Not a clock correction, just evidence that one response preceded a restart. Worth checking whether yours records that boundary.

15
EM
EmmaChan1072

For future attempts, ask the programmer for an identifier that survives restart and distinguishes retries; it won't recover the missing identity in this old acknowledgement.

18

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。