Ask the designer which surfaces locate and which merely support or guide. I would compare that intended scheme with repeated seating of one identified bracket before interpreting differences across the whole sample group.
Then repeatability is already a question within one piece. Record which contacts change between those positions under the bench inspection method; do not use extra clamp force to choose a winner.
Sam's observation also keeps sample variation from becoming the automatic explanation. You can examine different brackets afterwards without losing the two seats already found.
Ask which part datum each is supposed to establish and how the drawing tolerances are accommodated. Two labelled locators can still be a valid arrangement, but the designer needs to explain this observed alternate seating, not just repeat the labels.
And use the identified sample that found two seats when that check happens. A different, convenient bracket could conceal the problem while the drawing revision appears to close it.