My bracket nest has plenty of contacts and no consistent seat
JoBaker0505 · 2026年8月24日 19:14 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
13 条回复
Ask the designer which surfaces locate and which merely support or guide. I would compare that intended scheme with repeated seating of one identified bracket before interpreting differences across the whole sample group.
13分Are the samples all the drawing revision used for the nest?
6分Same revision, identities checked. One bracket can settle in two positions with the clamp open.
21分Then repeatability is already a question within one piece. Record which contacts change between those positions under the bench inspection method; do not use extra clamp force to choose a winner.
13分Sam's observation also keeps sample variation from becoming the automatic explanation. You can examine different brackets afterwards without losing the two seats already found.
23分One corner lifts when the opposite guide is touched. Designer's sheet calls both features locators.
18分That names the conflict to review, not the feature you should grind away.
18分Ask which part datum each is supposed to establish and how the drawing tolerances are accommodated. Two labelled locators can still be a valid arrangement, but the designer needs to explain this observed alternate seating, not just repeat the labels.
17分Designer found the guide copied from an earlier bracket revision into this nest. Current parts were correct.
6分Has the nest changed yet?
13分No. Revised guide clearance proposed; drawing review first, then bench checks. Stronger clamp suggestion withdrawn.
16分Keep the observation that made the error visible in the revised tooling check.
7分And use the identified sample that found two seats when that check happens. A different, convenient bracket could conceal the problem while the drawing revision appears to close it.
16分