My bracket nest has plenty of contacts and no consistent seat

JoBaker0505 · 24 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC

Reply to discussion
JO
JoBaker0505
UR5e inspection nest looks neat in CAD; machined brackets disagree on the bench. Stronger clamp proposed before anyone explains the contacts.

13 replies

SA
SarahAllen0328
Replying to JoBaker0505

Ask the designer which surfaces locate and which merely support or guide. I would compare that intended scheme with repeated seating of one identified bracket before interpreting differences across the whole sample group.

13 points
EL
ElenaBennett0775
Replying to JoBaker0505

Are the samples all the drawing revision used for the nest?

6 points
JO
JoBaker0505
Replying to ElenaBennett0775

Same revision, identities checked. One bracket can settle in two positions with the clamp open.

21 points
SA
SamChan1116
Replying to JoBaker0505

Then repeatability is already a question within one piece. Record which contacts change between those positions under the bench inspection method; do not use extra clamp force to choose a winner.

13 points
SA
SarahAllen0328
Replying to SamChan1116

Sam's observation also keeps sample variation from becoming the automatic explanation. You can examine different brackets afterwards without losing the two seats already found.

23 points
JO
JoBaker0505
Replying to SamChan1116

One corner lifts when the opposite guide is touched. Designer's sheet calls both features locators.

18 points
AN
AnnaAli0242
Replying to JoBaker0505

That names the conflict to review, not the feature you should grind away.

18 points
SA
SamChan1116
Replying to JoBaker0505

Ask which part datum each is supposed to establish and how the drawing tolerances are accommodated. Two labelled locators can still be a valid arrangement, but the designer needs to explain this observed alternate seating, not just repeat the labels.

17 points
JO
JoBaker0505
Replying to SamChan1116

Designer found the guide copied from an earlier bracket revision into this nest. Current parts were correct.

6 points
EL
ElenaBennett0775
Replying to JoBaker0505

Has the nest changed yet?

13 points
JO
JoBaker0505
Replying to ElenaBennett0775

No. Revised guide clearance proposed; drawing review first, then bench checks. Stronger clamp suggestion withdrawn.

16 points
AN
AnnaAli0242
Replying to JoBaker0505

Keep the observation that made the error visible in the revised tooling check.

7 points
SA
SarahAllen0328
Replying to AnnaAli0242

And use the identified sample that found two seats when that check happens. A different, convenient bracket could conceal the problem while the drawing revision appears to close it.

16 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.