简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
Ash_Bowen · 2026年1月28日 00:35 UTC
Is it a checking fixture with its own drawing, or just another bracket somebody uses as a comparison? That would change who I'd ask first
22分Proper checking fixture. Drawing exists. Its label has no revision.
12分Before a new training sheet calls this distortion, I would ask quality to compare the checking fixture with the current part drawing. The old instruction may be teaching people to satisfy the wrong object.
6分And measure a released part properly. An unlabeled nest may still be the right nest.
5分What actually fails when you put the bracket in it? One locating point, or the whole shape?
13分Rear lug will not enter. Quality measured released samples against revision F; those samples pass.
23分Then the old correction instruction sounds particularly expensive. Has anyone checked whether that rear lug changed between drawing versions? Not saying it did, just a fairly small comparison to make now
13分Ash, were those samples measured before correction?
8分Yes. Untouched after release. Nest matches revision D, including the old rear-lug position.
0分That explains why the experienced operator was quietly ignoring the nest while the relief operator followed it. Give them one agreed replacement instruction, otherwise the old habit wins whenever the updated sheet goes missing.
8分Old nest withdrawn. Quality issued revision F inspection instruction. Correction step removed for this mismatch, trainer briefed.
20分Useful find. Do not bin the old nest before its identity is marked.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .