Ash_Bowen · 28 Jan 2026, 00:35 UTC
Is it a checking fixture with its own drawing, or just another bracket somebody uses as a comparison? That would change who I'd ask first
22 pointsProper checking fixture. Drawing exists. Its label has no revision.
12 pointsBefore a new training sheet calls this distortion, I would ask quality to compare the checking fixture with the current part drawing. The old instruction may be teaching people to satisfy the wrong object.
6 pointsAnd measure a released part properly. An unlabeled nest may still be the right nest.
5 pointsWhat actually fails when you put the bracket in it? One locating point, or the whole shape?
13 pointsRear lug will not enter. Quality measured released samples against revision F; those samples pass.
23 pointsThen the old correction instruction sounds particularly expensive. Has anyone checked whether that rear lug changed between drawing versions? Not saying it did, just a fairly small comparison to make now
13 pointsAsh, were those samples measured before correction?
8 pointsYes. Untouched after release. Nest matches revision D, including the old rear-lug position.
0 pointsThat explains why the experienced operator was quietly ignoring the nest while the relief operator followed it. Give them one agreed replacement instruction, otherwise the old habit wins whenever the updated sheet goes missing.
8 pointsOld nest withdrawn. Quality issued revision F inspection instruction. Correction step removed for this mismatch, trainer briefed.
20 pointsUseful find. Do not bin the old nest before its identity is marked.
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .