applicationrobot.English

1750 mm reach is tempting. Still keeping the positioner?

ThomasAbbott0016 · 2025年9月11日 09:18 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

TH
ThomasAbbott0016
UR8 Long welding application pictured in the September 2025 announcement
September 2025 announcement: 1750 mm reach, 8 kg payload; shipping planned for October. Launch photograph: Universal Robots. Published 2025-09-08. Source

UR8 Long was announced this week: 1750 mm reach, 8 kg payload. I'm interested in reaching more of a weldment without shifting the base. I'd still lay out torch angles and cable clearance before throwing out the positioner. Anyone else looking at long-reach arms mainly to simplify setup rather than chase speed?

https://www.universal-robots.com/news-and-media/news-center/universal-robots-unveils-ur8-long/

举报

3 条回复

JO
JoFixtures
回复 ThomasAbbott0016

Yes, but I would model the approaches as well as the weld path. Touching every point isn't the same as approaching each point usefully.

0分
举报
TO
TomMill
回复 ThomasAbbott0016

I'd keep the positioner in the comparison. Buying more reach to avoid rotating one awkward part can be a very expensive principle.

0分
举报
TH
ThomasAbbott0016
回复 ThomasAbbott0016

Not throwing it out! I want two layouts costed. The shorter one might still win once the torch is in the drawing.

0分
举报

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .